A Difference of Opinion

Like many others, I became fascinated with the Sundance Channel special, "One Punk Under God;" a documentary account of Jay Bakker (the son of former PTL leaders Jim and Tammy-Faye Bakker) and the church he founded (Revolution Church).

A good bit of the story becomes centered on how it affected Jay's church when he decided to proclaim that homosexuality is not a sin. Specifically, funding started to dry up, speaking invitations started to disappear, and several members left. Internally, he and other leaders of the church began to argue about the issue, and some tension appeared. The decision was made to "agree to disagree" on this and several other issues.

I was intrigued by the story of this community of believers (I had read Jay's book a while back), so I made my way over to the bulletin board sponsored by the church. I have been in a wonderful dialogue with the people there ever since. It is an incredible community, filled with people who have a variety of different "takes" on things, including many different opinions about homosexuality.

There is a contradiction in the church in Midian that I have been thinking about since my exposure to Revolution. That contradiction involves how we deal with differences of opinion. Most of the time, when faced with theological disagreement, we shrug it off. When was the last time a member of a church was shown the door for believing in transubstantiation? When was the last time a member of the church knew what transubstantiation actually was?

The disagreements that seem to separate the Body of Christ much more often are sins of the flesh. Drinking, dancing, fornicating, the three big "no-no's" in many fundamentalist circles, are significantly more divisive, these days, than justification controversies or canon debates.

What happens when the fornicators, drinkers, and Solid Gold dance team shows up in the front pew and refuses to leave? What happens after you tell them to "sin no more" and they "sin no less." Where in the church's life does it need to be fully accepting of different opinions on personal holiness, and when does it need to clean house?

As is probably not too surprising, this problem isn't new. In fact, well before we started sweating the "emerging church" here in Midian, the Apostle Paul was dealing with the headaches from the Church in Corinth. Much of his first epistle to the Corinthians deals with this difficult balance between accepting and rejecting; exercising good judgment, without being judgmental; rebuking with love instead of loving to rebuke.

It is a delicate balance....Grace is freely-given to all sinners (whether they are good enough to keep their sins secret or not); but, true faith is also transformative ...if the faith is not challenging you to lead a better life, can it really be the Spirit that you are responding to?

In building a Christian community in Midian, we have to keep in mind both sides of that balance....

One side of that balance is in Paul's letter to the Corinthians states in chapter 9:

24 Do you not know that those who run in a race all run, but only one receives the prize? Run in such a way that you may win. 25 Everyone who competes in the games exercises self-control in all things. They then do it to receive a perishable wreath, but we an imperishable. 26 Therefore I run in such a way, as not without aim; I box in such a way, as not beating the air; 27 but I discipline my body and make it my slave, so that, after I have preached to others, I myself will not be disqualified.

The other side to that balance comes in chapter 13 of the same letter:

1 If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but do not have love, I have become a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal. 2 If I have the gift of prophecy, and know all mysteries and all knowledge; and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. 3 And if I give all my possessions to feed the poor, and if I surrender my body to be burned, but do not have love, it profits me nothing.
4 Love is patient, love is kind and is not jealous; love does not brag and is not arrogant, 5 does not act unbecomingly; it does not seek its own, is not provoked, does not take into account a wrong suffered, 6 does not rejoice in unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth; 7 bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.

Keeping an even keel means guiding people to a true transformative faith with a spirit of love...and it is no easy task. It just happens to also be the single most important thing we ever do in life....

Get on the Boat

Mark 4: 35-41

³⁵ That day when evening came, he said to his disciples, "Let us go over to the other side." ³⁶ Leaving the crowd behind, they took him along, just as he was, in the boat. There were also other boats with him. ³⁷ A furious squall came up, and the waves broke over the boat, so that it was nearly swamped. ³⁸ Jesus was in the stern, sleeping on a cushion. The disciples woke him and said to him, "Teacher, don't you care if we drown?"

³⁹ He got up, rebuked the wind and said to the waves, "Quiet! Be still!" Then the wind died down and it was completely calm.

⁴⁰ He said to his disciples, "Why are you so afraid? Do you still have no faith?"

⁴¹ They were terrified and asked each other, "Who is this? Even the wind and the waves obey him!"

When you spend enough time with the four Gospel accounts in the Bible, you start noticing certain differences. While there certainly are differences in some story accounts, the specific differences I am talking about are the inflections and connotations that reflect differences in purpose, target audience, and author perspective. The Book of Matthew was written for the Jewish community, the Book of Luke was written for Gentiles; The Book of John was written as a theological argument, the Book of Luke was written as a historical account; the list goes on...

Something unique about the Book of Mark, the Gospel account which I have spent the most time with, is that it paints a particularly harsh picture of the disciples. Throughout the Gospel account, the disciples are seen as utterly clueless, and Jesus is portrayed as being quite annoyed with their lack of prescience.

It would be easy to dismiss the disciples' errors as the product of remarkable naiveté; they were simple people who just didn't have the most equipped of minds. While it is tempting to just say that the disciples were slow, that is clearly not the case, and not the cause of Jesus' frustration.

The disciples were, largely, composed of members of the Jewish "middle class," people who were not the heads of great households; but, were also far from being simpletons. Fishermen, carpenters, even a tax collector, were "working people," people who could make a good life for themselves if they worked hard. The literacy of the group is later testified to by the development of the scripture, and the apologies (arguments) that they would later take throughout the ancient world. Jesus was not frustrated with the disciples' lack of intelligence; He was frustrated with their insistence upon using reason and experience, to the exclusion of faith.

When particular events befall the disciples in Mark (many times throughout the Gospel), their first reaction is to ponder the normal meaning and consequences of those events against others they have lived through. When the storm rises in the passage above, the disciples reason instantly that they are going to die. This is not an ignorant projection; several of the disciples are fishermen who have seen such storms before. Jesus, during this mighty tempest, was catching a few "z's." When He is woken up, He immediately calms the storm and questions why the disciples would be afraid. The disciples, who now find themselves standing on the deck of a boat in calm waters, look like children who were scared of the boogey man until their daddy turned on the light for them.

Jesus' surprise at the disciples' defeatism continues throughout the Book of Mark (before Jesus revives the daughter of Jairus, he first asks the crowd why they are weeping for the dead child; at the feeding of the 4,000, Jesus is dumbfounded that the disciples still "do not yet understand"). If we say that Jesus' anger is at the disciples' stupidity, then we miss the point. The disciples are behaving like any sane people would (being scared when a typhoon hits their small boat, crying at a funeral for a little girl, getting flustered when they can't feed all of the guests at an event); except, of course, if such "sane" people knew that God was with them.

One of the primary lessons for the disciples is that the rules of existence change when God is with you, and when you believe that fact to be true. When God is with you and you believe it to be true, miracles occur and there is little reason to be afraid. When God is with you and you believe it to be true, then the frustrations of our own limitations as people become less important than His lack of limitations. When God is with you and you believe it to be true, tragedy can never be the final scene; death is always trumped by life in the end.

The lesson on the boat, in the book of Mark, and in the cubicles here in Midian is that amidst the frustrations and the fears of frail human existence, we must remind ourselves that God is with us. We can be rational, we can be intelligent, we can be educated; but, if we do not have faith, then we won't make it past the storm to see the calm. If we depend less on our good sense, and more on Christ's presence, then the hazards in front of us may start to seem a lot less dire.